Forum Posts

Ahmed nayeem
Jul 31, 2022
In General Discussion
It was Hirokazu-eda's new film "Broker" (Taiwan translation of "Baby Transfer Station") that won the Best Actor Award at the Cannes Film Festival. It was recently released in Hong Kong, and the audience's response was generally good. But the film has been criticized in Cannes, and it is even considered to be the most disappointing work of this year. Note 1 ; I like the creation of Hirokazu Koreeda in the middle and early stages. Just six simple thoughts, it is a subjective chatter, I hope to be able to point out the problem: 1. If you don't say that this is Hirokazu-eda's movie, and just watch the scene scheduling of "Children's Transfer Station", who can immediately guess industry email list that this is his director's work? When I saw that it was Hirokazu Koreeda who made such boring and cumbersome works, I felt more anger than disappointment - since the excellent work "The Taste of Yokoyama's Home" (Still Walking, 2008), each one is worse than the other. , After more than ten years, what "emotional points" can there be? This film feels like a Japanese drama veteran shooting theatrical version, but it's just a little better. BROKER_STI_2 Photo Credit: Anle Video 2. The first shot of "Children's Transfer Station" shoots a long ladder in the rain, which is reminiscent of a similar scene in Bong Joon-ho's "Parasite" (Parasite, 2019). It turned out that it was also photographed by Hong Ai Piao. In recent years, he also filmed Li Changdong's "Burning Lost Paradise" (Burning, 2018). These two Korean films are truly first-class works, but "Children's Transfer Station" is more and more watched. Something is wrong, why is it so vulgar, how did Hong Nipi's p
6 thoughts on Hirokazu-eda's "Children's Transfer Station" content media
0
0
2
Ahmed nayeem

Ahmed nayeem

More actions